You are probably wondering why I titled the thread this way, because I have been thinking about something that this site has brought up. Ernest L Martin discovered that the true date of Jesus's birth was on September 11. I am someone who does not accept the official explanation about what happened on 9-11-01. Over the years I have come to discover that 9 -11 was a black magick mega ritual. If you are wondering where I got this from check out these 2 videos that talk about this:
Since I believe satanic occultists were behind 9/11 could they have known about Jesus's birthday being on 9/11 and picked that date for that reason as well as others as an affront to God? I wonder if that could of been the case, what are your thoughts guys?
Last Edit: Sept 24, 2013 10:40:47 GMT -8 by zerofly
Post by Ken Nagele on Sept 24, 2013 22:13:15 GMT -8
If we look at all other Illuminati false flags, assassinations, wars and other important events, you will find that all of them have significant occult dates attached to them.
So the real question here is, "Did the Illuminati purposely pick the date of 9/11/01 (knowing it is the true birth date of Jesus) - or, was it picked more esoterically (like all of the others) by a demonic influence?"
My guess would be that it was picked esoterically. I doubt that the Illuminati has the correct date figured out - or that they read Dr. Martin's book revealing that date. But, I could be wrong.
The date is so embedded in the psyche of the average person that I have to wonder if that will be the last major false flag event to occur before the second coming. This is, of course, pure speculation, but if there were to be another similar false flag of equal or even grater magnitude, what date would they pick for that? What date other than 9/11/01 would be more important biblically? I can't think of one.
Some day, perhaps before the second coming, the majority of people will learn and accept the correct date of Jesus' birth. They will have no trouble remembering it because of what happened on 9/11/01. They will also have to wonder about the incredible "coincidence" of the that date.
I am one of those people who thinks that some type of atomic bomb was used to bring down the wtc buildings. I can't understand how anyone at the time didn't question the usage of the phrase "ground zero", when at that time that phrase was only associated with an area where a nuclear detonation occurred. It was like they were trying to hide the truth right under our noses. If you look at the evidence of what happened in new york city it all points to a underground nuclear detonation of some kind. A lot of the first responders have died from cancer due to radiation and other harmful substances. A lot rescue animals within weeks or months after being in that area started getting sick and died. The fact that at the base of the disaster area there were extremely high degree temperatures that lasted for a whole month or more. How anyone could accept what was told to us about that day, and think nothing else happened is beyond me. The physical evidence is just too much to show that something else happened that day, then just the official story.